> Am 10.09.2020 um 18:58 schrieb Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>:
>
> On 01.09.20 14:51, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> in case of large continous areas that share the same allocation status
>> it happens that the value of s->sector_next_status is unaligned to the
>> cluster size or even request alignment of the source. Avoid this by
>> stripping down the s->sector_next_status position to cluster boundaries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de>
>> ---
>> qemu-img.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> I've just noticed that with this patch, the iotest 251 fails for vhdx.
> Would you be OK with squashing this in?
Sure, squash it in.
Thanks
Peter
