On 11/09/20 13:05, Max Reitz wrote: > On closer inspection it seems like it’s because of the > “build_by_default: false”, which seems like a rather conscious decision. > Was I only lucky that the socket_scm_helper was built by default so > far? Should I have explicitly built it all this time?
Yes, you were lucky but that's not a reason not to change it. The problem with touching a whole build system is that you are not going to test everybody's usecase, and yours is definitely reasonable and not "M-x butterfly" territory. Paolo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
