On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:56:06PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The distinction between short life and long life Linux distributions > turned out to be redundant. They can both be covered in a simple way > by noting support will target the current release, and the previous > release for a period of two years or until its EOL. This rule can also > apply to the other UNIX based distros, leaving only Windows needing a > different set of rules. > > This also clarifies that Debian LTS is out of scope, because the LTS > support is provided by a separate group from the main Debian maintainer > team. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > --- > > This is a spin off from the Python 3.5 thread > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg06358.html > > docs/system/build-platforms.rst | 59 ++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/system/build-platforms.rst b/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > index 9734eba2f1..03d2fd217f 100644 > --- a/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > +++ b/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > @@ -29,51 +29,28 @@ The Repology site https://repology.org is a useful > resource to identify [...] > +Linux OS, macOS, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD > +----------------------------------------- [...] > +For FreeBSD, decisions will be made based on the contents of the ports tree; > +for macOS, `HomeBrew`_ will be used, although `MacPorts`_ is expected to > carry > +similar versions.
Shouldn't we mention NetBSD and OpenBSD too? -- Eduardo
