On 9/26/20 7:31 AM, Helio Loureiro wrote:


On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 16:16 John Snow <js...@redhat.com <mailto:js...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    On 9/25/20 2:03 AM, Helio Loureiro wrote:
     > Hi,
     >
     > I would replace the word variable "kind" by "category".
     >

    Hi, welcome to the list!


Tkz!


    For patch reviews, we try to reply in-line, below the original post.


I realized that later.  It has been more than 20 years I don't use this formating.  But if I intend to join the pack, I need to follow the pack.



    (For more information on the QAPI Schema Language that we are parsing
    and validating here, see docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt if you are
    curious. Ultimately it is a JSON-like format that permits multiple
    objects per document and allows comments. We use these structures to
    generate types and command interfaces for our API protocol, QMP.)


Based on that I would suggest 'type_ref' instead to match the definitions over there and since word 'type' itself is reserved.


One of the unsolvable problems in computer science is naming things: "TYPE-REF" also has a specific meaning in QAPI, as it is the name of one of the BNF grammar tokens we use.

So I might suggest (if "kind" is too ambiguous), that I might use "statement_type" or "expression_type" if that helps clarify things.

--js


Reply via email to