On 11/10/20 17:35, Alexander Bulekov wrote: >> Instead of always looking for a separator, can you: >> >> 1) skip over it if you find it naturally at the end of a command (that >> is, "FUZZ" is like a comment command) >> >> 2) actively search for it only if you stumble upon an unrecognized command? >> > What is the end goal? Is it to be able to use the "FUZZ" bytes to fuzz > devices?
Yes, possibly, and perhaps also using a shorter separator that is easier to learn. But if the dictionary is enough to work around the learning time and it's unlikely that crossover produces inputs like that, I guess it's okay to have the separator. Paolo
