From: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
We already have the full ARMMMUIdx as computed from the
function parameter.
For the purpose of regime_has_2_ranges, we can ignore any
difference between AccType_Normal and AccType_Unpriv, which
would be the only difference between the passed mmu_idx
and arm_mmu_idx_el.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frasc...@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frasc...@arm.com>
Message-id: 20201008162155.161886-2-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/mte_helper.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/mte_helper.c b/target/arm/mte_helper.c
index 5615c6706cb..734cc5ca675 100644
--- a/target/arm/mte_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/mte_helper.c
@@ -563,8 +563,7 @@ static void mte_check_fail(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t desc,
case 2:
/* Tag check fail causes asynchronous flag set. */
- mmu_idx = arm_mmu_idx_el(env, el);
- if (regime_has_2_ranges(mmu_idx)) {
+ if (regime_has_2_ranges(arm_mmu_idx)) {
select = extract64(dirty_ptr, 55, 1);
} else {
select = 0;
--
2.20.1
