On 2011-08-24 12:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:28:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Nothing good can happen when we overlap capabilities
>>
>> [ Jan: rebased over qemu, minor formatting ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> 
> This doesn't build for me:
> 
> /scm/qemu/hw/pci.c: In function ‘pci_add_capability’:
> /scm/qemu/hw/pci.c:1970:45: error: ‘PCIDevice’ has no member named 
> ‘config_map’

Yeah, sorry, forgot to refresh the commit before posting.

> 
> I think that what that includes is the capability including each given
> offset, right?  It would be easy to write some code scanning the
> capability list to figure this value out.
> Something along the lines of (untested):
> 
> static
> uint8_t pci_find_capability_at_offset(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t offset)
> {                                       
>     uint8_t next, prev, found = 0;
> 
>     if (!(pdev->config[PCI_STATUS] & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST))
>         return 0;
> 
>     for (prev = PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST; (next = pdev->config[prev]);
>          prev = next + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT)
>         if (next <= offset && next > found)
>             found = next;
> 
>     return found;
> }

Sounds useful, will enhance the patch.

(Originally, I just wanted to reduce the qemu-kvm delta... :) )

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Reply via email to