Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Markus, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markus Armbruster >> >> >> > <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> [...] >> >> >> >> Regardless, I *will* make time for ripping the feature out if we >> >> >> >> decide to do that. Quick & easy way to avoid reviewing this series >> >> >> >> *hint* *hint*. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > well, fwiw, I would also take that approach too, to the risk of >> >> >> > upsetting >> >> >> > the users. >> >> >> >> >> >> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch. >> >> >> >> >> >> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object >> >> >> first. >> >> >> >> Daniel, do you object, yes or no? >> > >> > Yes, I object to removing the feature as it is clearly useful. >> >> Thanks. I sent v2 of my fixes. Can you take care of getting them >> merged, hopefully in time for 5.2? > > Sure, I'll aim to review & send PR today / tomorrow.
Excellent. I'll be around to address whatever review comments you may have.
