On 11/27/20 2:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 27/11/20 12:41, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> This seems to be due to "-machine none", is machine none supposed to >> have no default cpu_type? Is it expected that for machine none >> current_machine->cpu_type is NULL, or is it a bug? > > "-machine none" has no CPU at all, so I think anything is acceptable. > There's also the possibility of emulating big.LITTLE machines in the > future with >1 cpu_type, so the cop out of doing it on the whole > hierarchy is easiest. > > Paolo >
Ok will take that route then. Thanks! Claudio
