On 3/4/21 3:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 3/3/21 1:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:42:22PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>> The only difference between fedora-winXX-cross.docker and >>>> fedora.docker is the specific QEMU_CONFIGURE_OPTS environment >>>> variable. All the rest can be inherited from the generic Fedora >>>> image. >>> >>> This is relying on the base Fedora image already having the >>> mingw packages installed. My series to automate creation of >>> the container dockerfiles removes those entirely, so we have >>> strictly separate native and mingw images for Fedora: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-01/msg03123.html >> >> I'm a bit confused. So instead of having one single big image, >> you prefer to have multiple ones. >> >> I stopped using the fedora-winXX-cross because they lacks ccache, >> and the "big" fedora image contains the mingwXX toolchains. >> >> I'll wait you respin your series and test the new created containers >> to see if they fit my needs. > > ccache will be present in any of the containers I auto-generate for > QEMU using lcitool, as I agree its a very useful part o fthe toolchain. > So when i convert the winXXX-cross containers, they'll gain ccache > (and alot of other missing mingw pieces)
Cool, looking forward to QEMU using lcitool :)
