On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:22:02 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> We already have the 'run' variable holding 'cs->kvm_run' value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index 7a892d663df..73f816a7222 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
> int icpt_code = run->s390_sieic.icptcode;
> int r = 0;
>
> - DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code,
> - (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
> + DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, (long)run->psw_addr);
> switch (icpt_code) {
> case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
> case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
Thanks, queued this one to s390-next.
