On 3/25/21 5:59 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
Isn't tcg/tcg-* redundant?
I considered that, and at some point I had "cpu.c" for x86 too. After working
on it for a while, I noticed how
it got really confusing in practice to have files called just "cpu.c" when working on
them, just too many files are called "cpu.c". It was confusing.
I also like the extra emphasis on the accel for this:
kvm/kvm.c
kvm/kvm-cpu.c
kvm/kvm-stub.c
tcg/tcg-cpu.c
tcg/tcg-stub.c
But then you go and invent
cpu-sve.c
kvm/cpu-sve.c
tcg/cpu-sve.c
etc. So, please make up your mind.
r~
