On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:46:29PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(ms); > > + > > + qemu_mutex_lock(&bus_lock_ratelimit_lock); > > + uint64_t delay_ns = > > ratelimit_calculate_delay(&x86ms->bus_lock_ratelimit_ctrl, 1); > > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&bus_lock_ratelimit_lock); > > Stefan, ratelimit_calculate_delay() is supposed to be thread > safe, correct?
Yes, it was a recent change by Paolo Bonzini: commit 4951967d84a0acbf47895add9158e2d4c6056ea0 Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Apr 13 10:20:32 2021 +0200 ratelimit: protect with a mutex > > In that case, bus_lock_ratelimit_lock would be completely unnecessary. I agree.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature