On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:22:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> There is no reason to call the hvf specific hvf_cpu_synchronize_state()
> when we can just use the generic cpu_synchronize_state() instead. This
> allows us to have less dependency on internal function definitions and
> allows us to make hvf_cpu_synchronize_state() static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@csgraf.de>
> ---
>  accel/hvf/hvf-accel-ops.c | 2 +-
>  accel/hvf/hvf-accel-ops.h | 1 -
>  target/i386/hvf/x86hvf.c  | 9 ++++-----
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Sergio Lopez <s...@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to