On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:55, Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
> either bs->file or bs->backing. We close that child, close the node
> (with .bdrv_close()), apply the snapshot on the child node, and then
> re-open the node (with .bdrv_open()).
>
> In order for .bdrv_open() to attach the same child node that we had
> before, we pass "file={child-node}" or "backing={child-node}" to it.
> Therefore, when .bdrv_open() has returned success, we can assume that
> bs->file or bs->backing (respectively) points to our original child
> again. This is verified by an assertion.
>
> All of this is not immediately clear from a quick glance at the code,
> so add a comment to the assertion what it is for, and why it is valid.
> It certainly confused Coverity.
>
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1452774)
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
Did this patch get lost? I was just going through outstanding
coverity issues and noticed it was posted a month ago and not
in master...
thanks
-- PMM
