On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:22:01AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:07:46PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > Um.. why? PCI is defined by the spec to be LE, so I don't see that we
> > need explicit endianness versions for PCI helpers.
>
> LE in the spec only applies to structures defined by the spec,
> that is pci configuration and msix tables in device memory.
Well, true. But when was the last time you saw a PCI device with BE
registers? I think it's a rare enough case that the individual device
models can reswap themselves.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
