On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 20:32, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Split out a helper function to test for a v2 signal frame.
>
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> ---
> linux-user/arm/signal.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/arm/signal.c b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> index 32b68ee302..cb65623965 100644
> --- a/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(CPUARMState *regs)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static bool v2_frame(void)
> +{
> + return get_osversion() >= 0x020612;
> +}
Not sure how much we care about supporting claiming to be a 15-year-old
kernel any more (especially since we set UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE to 2.6.32...)
so it's awfully tempting to just blow away the v1 frame support instead...
Anyway
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
thanks
-- PMM
