Some files are not even listed, such as hw/vexpress.c, which seem to be GPL v2 (only)..
> Message du 18/10/11 16:37 > De : "Anthony Liguori" > A : "Andreas Färber" > Copie à : "Stefan Weil" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" , "Blue > Swirl" , "Max Filippov" , "Avi Kivity" , "Paolo Bonzini" > Objet : Re: [Qemu-devel] GPLv3 troubles > > On 10/18/2011 09:33 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 18.10.2011 15:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > >> Okay, let's get serious about it. I set up the following wiki page for > >> coordination: > >> > >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Relicensing > >> > >> Please get the appropriate approval at Red Hat, and follow the > >> instructions on the wiki. I'm in the process of getting approval at > >> IBM. Between RH, IBM, and Blue, there's a pretty large chunk of files > >> that can be relicensed immediately. It's probably best to tackle this > >> incrementally. > > > > Sounds like a plan, thanks. > > > > The file list still has some false positives. Might edit later. > > In block/ I noticed sheepdog.c and rbd.c that are GPLv2, too. > > Yes, please edit the wiki. I just attempted to post a strawman to get us > started. > > > A few files are completely lacking a license btw. > > Yes, we'll have to list those separately, contact the original author to add a > copyright statement+license, and get every contributor to SoB the change. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > Andreas > > > > > Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça vous tente ? Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net
