On 8/10/21 2:58 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >> On 8/9/21 10:06 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> On 8/9/21 9:55 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >>>> Hello Phil, >>>> >>>> On 8/9/21 9:06 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>>> Hi Cédric, >>>>> >>>>> On 8/6/21 8:00 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >>>>>> It includes support for the POWER10 processor and the QEMU platform. >>>>> >>>>> 1/ Can you include the output of 'git shortlog v6.4..820d43c0' here? >>>> >>>> OK. See attachement. >>> >>> By "here" I meant in the commit description ;) >> >> yeah I know but David queued the patch already. > > I can replace it with a new version. Including the shortlog is > probably worth it.
I will work on that for 6.2 Thanks C. >> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Built from submodule. >>>>> >>>>> 2/ Could we have a CI job building this, during 6.2 cycle? >>>>> (See .gitlab-ci.d/edk2.yml and .gitlab-ci.d/opensbi.yml) >>>> >>>> Sure. It doesn't look too complex. >>>> >>>> I plan to add acceptance tests for the QEMU powernv machines also >>>> once the OpenPOWER files (zImage.epapr and rootfs.cpio.xz) are >>>> published on GH. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> pc-bios/skiboot.lid | Bin 1667280 -> 2528128 bytes >>>>>> roms/skiboot | 2 +- >>>>>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/pc-bios/skiboot.lid b/pc-bios/skiboot.lid >>>>>> index >>>>>> 504b95e8b6611aff3a934ff10f789934680591f9..8a3c278512a428a034ed5b1ddbed017ae8c0a9d0 >>>>>> 100644 >>>>>> GIT binary patch >>>>>> literal 2528128 >>>>> >>>>> Consider using 'git-format-patch --no-binary' and a reference >>>>> to your repository to fetch a such big binary patch. >>>> >>>> David would pull from my tree then ? So that's like doing a PR. >>>> We can do that next time I send an update if David is OK with >>>> that. I should send an update for v7.0 tag. >>> >>> As you wish. Big patches gave us troubles, i.e. they make crash >>> the 'patches' instance. 2.5MiB is probably borderline and I'm >>> being nit-picky. >>> >> >> If we can do a PR next time, all should be fine. >> >> Thanks, >> >> C. >> >