On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:50 AM Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:24:52AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +    @upper_half
> > > > +    @require(Runstate.IDLE)
> > > > +    async def accept(self, address: Union[str, Tuple[str, int]],
> > > > +                     ssl: Optional[SSLContext] = None) -> None:
> > > > +        """
> > > > +        Accept a connection and begin processing message queues.
> > > > +
> > > > +        If this call fails, `runstate` is guaranteed to be set back
> to
> > > `IDLE`.
> > > > +
> > > > +        :param address:
> > > > +            Address to listen to; UNIX socket path or TCP
> address/port.
> > >
> > > Can't TCP use a well-known port name instead of an int?  But limiting
> > > clients to just int port for now isn't fatal to the patch.
> > >
> > >
> > The old QMP library didn't support this, and I used the old library as my
> > template here. I'm willing to change the address format and types to be
> > more comprehensive, but I was thinking that it should probably try to
> match
> > or adhere to some standard; de-facto or otherwise. I wasn't sure which to
> > pick, and we use a few different ones in QEMU itself. Any recommendations
> > for me?
>
> I asked because I know QAPI specifies TCP as string/string (the
> hostname as a string makes absolute sense, but the port number as a
> string is because of the less-used feature of a well-known port name).
> I'm fine if the initial patch uses an int for the port number here; we
> can always add support for more formats down the road when someone
> actually has a use for them.
>
>
https://docs.python.org/3/library/socket.html#socket-families

"A pair (host, port) is used for the AF_INET address family, where host is
a string representing either a hostname in Internet domain notation like '
daring.cwi.nl' or an IPv4 address like '100.50.200.5', and port is an
integer."

The docs seem to suggest that I am actually limited only to integers here.
Do you have an example of using a string for a port number? I have to admit
I am not well acquainted with it.

Reply via email to