On 9/27/21 18:53, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 9/27/21 18:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On 9/27/21 06:48, David Gibson wrote:
>>> machine_ppc.py contains tests for 3 different ppc based machine
>>> types.  It
>>> is listed in MAINTAINERS along with the PPC TCG cpu code.  That's not
>>> really accurate though, since it's really more about testing those
>>> machines
>>> than the CPUs.
>>>
>>> Therefore, split it up into separate files for the separate machine
>>> types,
>>> and list those along with their machine types in MAINTAINERS.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>>> ---
>>>   MAINTAINERS                          |  4 +-
>>>   tests/acceptance/machine_ppc.py      | 69 ----------------------------
>>>   tests/acceptance/ppc_mpc8544ds.py    | 32 +++++++++++++
>>>   tests/acceptance/ppc_pseries.py      | 35 ++++++++++++++
>>>   tests/acceptance/ppc_virtex_ml507.py | 34 ++++++++++++++
>>>   5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>>   delete mode 100644 tests/acceptance/machine_ppc.py
>>>   create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/ppc_mpc8544ds.py
>>>   create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/ppc_pseries.py
>>>   create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/ppc_virtex_ml507.py
>>
>> Since I'm preparing an integration-testing pull request,
>> I'll queue this single patch directly, to avoid future
>> merge conflicts.
>>
> 
> Should I resend this patch ?
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/20210817093036.1288791-1-...@kaod.org/

Doh, I scanned the list for patches unattended during the last 8 months
but apparently missed it. No need to resend.


Reply via email to