On 9/28/21 05:57, Yanan Wang wrote:
> We have two requirements for a valid SMP configuration:
> the product of "sockets * cores * threads" must represent all the
> possible cpus, i.e., max_cpus, and then must include the initially
> present cpus, i.e., smp_cpus.
> 
> So we only need to ensure 1) "sockets * cores * threads == maxcpus"
> at first and then ensure 2) "maxcpus >= cpus". With a reasonable
> order of the sanity check, we can simplify the error reporting code.
> When reporting an error message we also report the exact value of
> each topology member to make users easily see what's going on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyana...@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gu...@ionos.com>
> ---
>  hw/core/machine.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
>  hw/i386/pc.c      | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to