On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 13:11, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Currently we have a bit of a mishmash of different function > names for bus creation. There are two basic patterns: you > can have a function that allocates and returns a new bus > object; or you can have a function that takes a pointer to > a bus object and initializes it in-place. We have to some > extent a convention for those: the allocate-and-return > function is 'foo_new()', and the 'init in-place' function > is 'foo_init()'. However many of our bus creation functions > don't follow that; some use 'foo_new' vs 'foo_new_inplace'; > some use 'foo_new' for the in-place init version; and > the bottom level qbus functions are 'qbus_create' vs > 'qbus_create_inplace'. This series tries to bring at least > scsi, ipack, pci, ide, and qbus into line with the > _new-vs-_init naming convention.
Thanks all for the reviews/acks. I'm going to take this via target-arm.next. -- PMM
