Hi Igor,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:39 PM Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 23:38:24 +0800
> Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Using memory_region_init_ram(), which can't possibly handle vhost-user,
> > and can't work as expected with '-numa node,memdev' options.
> >
> > Use MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing RAM memory
> > region, as well as by providing MachineClass::default_ram_id to
> > opt in to memdev scheme.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c | 9 +++------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c b/hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c
> > index e475b6d511..f10f55b488 100644
> > --- a/hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c
> > +++ b/hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c
> > @@ -459,7 +459,6 @@ static void
> > microchip_icicle_kit_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
> > const MemMapEntry *memmap = microchip_pfsoc_memmap;
> > MicrochipIcicleKitState *s = MICROCHIP_ICICLE_KIT_MACHINE(machine);
> > MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
> > - MemoryRegion *mem_low = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > MemoryRegion *mem_low_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > MemoryRegion *mem_high = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > MemoryRegion *mem_high_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > @@ -486,16 +485,13 @@ static void
> > microchip_icicle_kit_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
> > qdev_realize(DEVICE(&s->soc), NULL, &error_abort);
> >
> > /* Register RAM */
> > - memory_region_init_ram(mem_low, NULL, "microchip.icicle.kit.ram_low",
> > - memmap[MICROCHIP_PFSOC_DRAM_LO].size,
> > - &error_fatal);
> > memory_region_init_alias(mem_low_alias, NULL,
> > "microchip.icicle.kit.ram_low.alias",
> > - mem_low, 0,
> > + machine->ram, 0,
> > memmap[MICROCHIP_PFSOC_DRAM_LO_ALIAS].size);
> > memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
> > memmap[MICROCHIP_PFSOC_DRAM_LO].base,
> > - mem_low);
> > + machine->ram);
> > memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
> > memmap[MICROCHIP_PFSOC_DRAM_LO_ALIAS].base,
> > mem_low_alias);
>
> looking at code it seems RAM is split between low and high regions,
> so converting only low region is wrong.
>
> I'd suggest something similar to 2dc9ce13d210 : taihu_405ep_init().
> i.e. ms->ram should hold whole RAM that is split between low and high
> using aliases.
Thank you for your pointers. I have just sent v2.
One note when looking at the taihu_405ep_init() implementation, the
following looks incorrect to me:
memory_region_init_alias(&ram_memories[1], NULL,
"taihu_405ep.ram-1", machine->ram, ram_bases[1],
ram_sizes[1]);
I think the 'offset' should be ram_sizes[0] instead of ram_bases[1],
although their values are the same which means they are two contiguous
regions, so it happens to work. But I might be nitpicking ...
>
> > @@ -606,6 +602,7 @@ static void
> > microchip_icicle_kit_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > MICROCHIP_PFSOC_COMPUTE_CPU_COUNT;
> > mc->min_cpus = MICROCHIP_PFSOC_MANAGEMENT_CPU_COUNT + 1;
> > mc->default_cpus = mc->min_cpus;
> > + mc->default_ram_id = "microchip.icicle.kit.ram_low";
>
> given it is not versioned machine, so we don't have to worry about
> cross version migration here,
> so I'd use "microchip.icicle.kit.ram" for the name here
> and currently used "microchip.icicle.kit.ram_low" for corresponding alias
Regards,
Bin
