On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 04:39:20PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:25:05AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 11:45:42AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Looks like this can not be applied yet because the bypass bit > > > > isn't in yet. what's up with that? > > > > > > The boot-bypass bit isn't a hard dependency for this series, but it will > > > be needed for full support eventually. It will be delayed by spec and > > > Linux header changes > > > > > > In the meantime we can work around the problem by having the boot disks > > > bypass the IOMMU (virtio without iommu-platform, or iommu-bypass bus). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jean > > > > OK... how do we want to apply all this? > > If my tree I either need ack from an ARM maintainers, or > > post a partial patchset with just x86 bits. > > Either works for me, with preference for keeping a single series > (otherwise I need to split patch 8, or add the tests later). I'll send v5 > whole. > > Thanks, > Jean
Then you will need an ack from arm maintainers. -- MST