On 10/25/21 11:13 AM, Luis Fernando Fujita Pires wrote:
From: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
static bool fold_eqv(OptContext *ctx, TCGOp *op) {
- return fold_const2(ctx, op);
+ if (fold_const2(ctx, op) ||
+ fold_xi_to_not(ctx, op, 0)) {
Should be fold_ix_to_not (not fold xi_to_not).
No, because for eqv we expect the second operand to be the constant -- eqv is
commutative.
Ah, got it! The previous code was wrong, and I failed to notice that eqv
would've had its arguments swapped to have the constant as second.
Ah! I failed to notice that the previous code was wrong. ;-)
r~
