[PATCH 05/26] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Don't return early in extract_table_params() loop

[Peter Maydell]

In extract_table_params() we process each GITS_BASER<n> register.  If
the register's Valid bit is not set, this means there is no
in-guest-memory table and so we should not try to interpret the other
fields in the register.  This was incorrectly coded as a 'return'
rather than a 'break', so instead of looping round to process the
next GITS_BASER<n> we would stop entirely, treating any later tables
as being not valid also.

This has no real guest-visible effects because (since we don't have
GITS_TYPER.HCC != 0) the guest must in any case set up all the
GITS_BASER<n> to point to valid tables, so this only happens in an
odd misbehaving-guest corner case.

Fix the check to 'break', so that we leave the case statement and
loop back around to the next GITS_BASER<n>.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
---
I suspect this was an accidental result from a refactoring at
some point in the development of the ITS code.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
index f321f10189e..c97b9982ae1 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void extract_table_params(GICv3ITSState *s)
             s->dt.valid = FIELD_EX64(value, GITS_BASER, VALID);
 
             if (!s->dt.valid) {
-                return;
+                break;
             }
 
             s->dt.page_sz = page_sz;
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void extract_table_params(GICv3ITSState *s)
              * hence writes are discarded if ct.valid is 0
              */
             if (!s->ct.valid) {
-                return;
+                break;
             }
 
             s->ct.page_sz = page_sz;
-- 
2.25.1