On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:44:44 +0100 Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > The PoP says that the machine shall ignore other fields > > of the PMCW when an MSCH is performed. I.e. we should not update > > "our" pmcw.flags bit 5 from 0 to 1 even if 1 was supplied, and > > thus STSCH should keep storing the bit 5 as 0 even if there was > > a MSCH with bit 5 set. > > So I do understand that there is no problem, we do not keep track > of this bit in our pmcw.flags and stsch keep storing this bit as 0. right? Right! False alarm by me -- sorry. Regards, Halil
