Hi Michael,
Thanks for examining this! Inline response below.
eric

On 1/25/22 06:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 04:23:49PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:


On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Eric DeVolder wrote:

This builds the ACPI ERST table to inform OSPM how to communicate
with the acpi-erst device.

Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devol...@oracle.com>
---
  hw/acpi/erst.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 188 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/acpi/erst.c b/hw/acpi/erst.c
index fe9ba51..b0c7539 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/erst.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/erst.c
@@ -59,6 +59,27 @@
  #define STATUS_RECORD_STORE_EMPTY     0x04
  #define STATUS_RECORD_NOT_FOUND       0x05

+/* ACPI 4.0: Table 17-19 Serialization Instructions */
+#define INST_READ_REGISTER                 0x00
+#define INST_READ_REGISTER_VALUE           0x01
+#define INST_WRITE_REGISTER                0x02
+#define INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE          0x03
+#define INST_NOOP                          0x04
+#define INST_LOAD_VAR1                     0x05
+#define INST_LOAD_VAR2                     0x06
+#define INST_STORE_VAR1                    0x07
+#define INST_ADD                           0x08
+#define INST_SUBTRACT                      0x09
+#define INST_ADD_VALUE                     0x0A
+#define INST_SUBTRACT_VALUE                0x0B
+#define INST_STALL                         0x0C
+#define INST_STALL_WHILE_TRUE              0x0D
+#define INST_SKIP_NEXT_INSTRUCTION_IF_TRUE 0x0E
+#define INST_GOTO                          0x0F
+#define INST_SET_SRC_ADDRESS_BASE          0x10
+#define INST_SET_DST_ADDRESS_BASE          0x11
+#define INST_MOVE_DATA                     0x12
+
  /* UEFI 2.1: Appendix N Common Platform Error Record */
  #define UEFI_CPER_RECORD_MIN_SIZE 128U
  #define UEFI_CPER_RECORD_LENGTH_OFFSET 20U
@@ -172,6 +193,173 @@ typedef struct {

  /*******************************************************************/
  /*******************************************************************/
+
+/* ACPI 4.0: 17.4.1.2 Serialization Instruction Entries */
+static void build_serialization_instruction_entry(GArray *table_data,
+    uint8_t serialization_action,
+    uint8_t instruction,
+    uint8_t flags,
+    uint8_t register_bit_width,
+    uint64_t register_address,
+    uint64_t value)
+{
+    /* ACPI 4.0: Table 17-18 Serialization Instruction Entry */
+    struct AcpiGenericAddress gas;
+    uint64_t mask;
+
+    /* Serialization Action */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, serialization_action, 1);
+    /* Instruction */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, instruction         , 1);
+    /* Flags */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, flags               , 1);
+    /* Reserved */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0                   , 1);
+    /* Register Region */
+    gas.space_id = AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY;
+    gas.bit_width = register_bit_width;
+    gas.bit_offset = 0;
+    gas.access_width = ctz32(register_bit_width) - 2;
+    gas.address = register_address;
+    build_append_gas_from_struct(table_data, &gas);
+    /* Value */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, value  , 8);
+    /* Mask */
+    mask = (1ULL << (register_bit_width - 1) << 1) - 1;
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, mask  , 8);
+}
+
+/* ACPI 4.0: 17.4.1 Serialization Action Table */
+void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, Object *erst_dev,
+    const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id)
+{
+    GArray *table_instruction_data;
+    unsigned action;
+    pcibus_t bar0 = pci_get_bar_addr(PCI_DEVICE(erst_dev), 0);
+    AcpiTable table = { .sig = "ERST", .rev = 1, .oem_id = oem_id,
+                        .oem_table_id = oem_table_id };
+
+    trace_acpi_erst_pci_bar_0(bar0);
+
+    /*
+     * Serialization Action Table
+     * The serialization action table must be generated first
+     * so that its size can be known in order to populate the
+     * Instruction Entry Count field.
+     */
+    table_instruction_data = g_array_new(FALSE, FALSE, sizeof(char));
+
+    /*
+     * Macros for use with construction of the action instructions
+     */
+#define BUILD_READ_REGISTER(width_in_bits, reg) \
+    build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
+        action, INST_READ_REGISTER, 0, width_in_bits, \
+        bar0 + reg, 0)
+
+#define BUILD_READ_REGISTER_VALUE(width_in_bits, reg, value) \
+    build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
+        action, INST_READ_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, width_in_bits, \
+        bar0 + reg, value)
+
+#define BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER(width_in_bits, reg, value) \
+    build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
+        action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER, 0, width_in_bits, \
+        bar0 + reg, value)
+
+#define BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(width_in_bits, reg, value) \
+    build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
+        action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, width_in_bits, \
+        bar0 + reg, value)


I think these macros which in a hidden way use the bar0 variable really
should be replaced with inline functions, improving type safety.

I had not stated this previously, but my choice for using macros over functions
was the use three local variables: table_instruction_data, bar0, and action.

Any function would then automatically require these three as parameters, or I'm
stuffing these temporary items into local globals (to avoid passing as 
parameters).

As for the type safety of bar0, I don't quite understand what I should do 
differently
(regardless of macro vs function). Ultimately these call 
build_serialization_instruction_entry()
with the 'uint64_t register address' accepting the bar0+offset value. Bar0 is 
pcibar_t
and the compiler happily implicitly typecasts to uint64_t.

What would an acceptable function prototype look like?





+
+    /* Serialization Instruction Entries */
+    action = ACTION_BEGIN_WRITE_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_BEGIN_READ_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_BEGIN_CLEAR_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_END_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_SET_RECORD_OFFSET;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0);
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_EXECUTE_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET,
+        ERST_EXECUTE_OPERATION_MAGIC);

except here, on all cases we have
BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);

We should treat the above as special case and simplify the rest of the
calls (eliminate repeated common arguments).

+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_CHECK_BUSY_STATUS;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0x01);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_COMMAND_STATUS;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_RECORD_IDENTIFIER;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_SET_RECORD_IDENTIFIER;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0);
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);

This one seems reverted. Should this be
BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0);

like others?

+
+    action = ACTION_GET_RECORD_COUNT;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_BEGIN_DUMMY_WRITE_OPERATION;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_RANGE;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_LENGTH;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_RANGE_ATTRIBUTES;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(32, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+
+    action = ACTION_GET_EXECUTE_OPERATION_TIMINGS;
+    BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(32, ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action);
+    BUILD_READ_REGISTER(64, ERST_VALUE_OFFSET);
+

BUILD_READ_REGISTER() is always called with ERST_VALUE_OFFSET as second
argument. WE should eliminate this repeated passing of same argument.


+    /* Serialization Header */
+    acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
+
+    /* Serialization Header Size */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 48, 4);
+
+    /* Reserved */
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,  0, 4);
+
+    /*
+     * Instruction Entry Count
+     * Each instruction entry is 32 bytes
+     */
+    g_assert((table_instruction_data->len) % 32 == 0);
+    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,
+        (table_instruction_data->len / 32), 4);
+
+    /* Serialization Instruction Entries */
+    g_array_append_vals(table_data, table_instruction_data->data,
+        table_instruction_data->len);
+    g_array_free(table_instruction_data, TRUE);
+
+    acpi_table_end(linker, &table);
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************/
+/*******************************************************************/
  static uint8_t *get_nvram_ptr_by_index(ERSTDeviceState *s, unsigned index)
  {
      uint8_t *rc = NULL;
--
1.8.3.1




Reply via email to