On 25.01.22 17:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 25/1/22 15:54, Nico Boehr wrote: >> On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 14:13 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> I think you can actually just reuse in2_m2_64a, similar as we handle >>> SCKC >> >> I tried my SCK tests with your patch, it works just as well and seems >> much cleaner, thanks. >> >> Do you want to send this or should I make a v2 and add you as >> Suggested-by? > > v2 ;)
Yes, v2 please :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
