On Freitag, 28. Januar 2022 14:38:43 CET Will Cohen wrote:
> Apologies! The explanation (and what I'll include in v4) is below:
> 
> The previous test depended on the assumption that P9_DOTL_AT_REMOVEDIR and
> AT_REMOVEDIR have the same value.
> 
> While this is true on Linux, it is not true everywhere, and leads to an
> incorrect test failure on unlink_at, noticed when adding 9p to darwin.

Additionally describing the observed misbehaviour is always useful.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck



Reply via email to