On 06/02/2022 21.07, Will Cohen wrote:
The previous test depended on the assumption that P9_DOTL_AT_REMOVEDIR and AT_REMOVEDIR have the same value.While this is true on Linux, it is not true everywhere, and leads to an incorrect test failure on unlink_at, noticed when adding 9p to darwin: Received response 7 (RLERROR) instead of 77 (RUNLINKAT) Rlerror has errno 22 (Invalid argument) ** ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:305:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 77) Bail out! ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:305:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 77) Signed-off-by: Fabian Franz <fabianfranz....@gmail.com> [Will Cohen: - Add explanation of patch and description of pre-patch test failure] Signed-off-by: Will Cohen <wwco...@gmail.com> --- tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c index 41fed41de1..6bcf89f0f8 100644 --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void fs_unlinkat_dir(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) /* ... and is actually a directory */ g_assert((st.st_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFDIR);- do_unlinkat(v9p, "/", "02", AT_REMOVEDIR);+ do_unlinkat(v9p, "/", "02", P9_DOTL_AT_REMOVEDIR); /* directory should be gone now */ g_assert(stat(new_dir, &st) != 0);
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
