On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:13:51AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > That problem isn't new and we already have a bunch of aml_* stubs > because of that. I expect it'll work just fine, at worst we'll > have to add a stub or two in case some calls are not covered yet.
Right but adding these stubs is a bother, we keep missing some. If possible I'd like the solution to be cleaner than the status quo. Is adding a wrapper instead of setting a method directly such a big problem really? -- MST
