[PULL 08/23] target/riscv: Fix coding style on "G" expansion

[Alistair Francis]

From: Tsukasa OI <research_tra...@irq.a4lg.com>

Because ext_? members are boolean variables, operator `&&' should be
used instead of `&'.

Signed-off-by: Tsukasa OI <research_tra...@irq.a4lg.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colo...@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: 
<91633f8349253656dd08bc8dc36498a9c7538b10.1652583332.git.research_tra...@irq.a4lg.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index dc93412395..e439716337 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -596,8 +596,8 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)
             return;
         }
 
-        if (cpu->cfg.ext_g && !(cpu->cfg.ext_i & cpu->cfg.ext_m &
-                                cpu->cfg.ext_a & cpu->cfg.ext_f &
+        if (cpu->cfg.ext_g && !(cpu->cfg.ext_i && cpu->cfg.ext_m &&
+                                cpu->cfg.ext_a && cpu->cfg.ext_f &&
                                 cpu->cfg.ext_d)) {
             warn_report("Setting G will also set IMAFD");
             cpu->cfg.ext_i = true;
-- 
2.35.3