On Jun 2 09:32, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 6/2/22 00:05, Corey Minyard wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:08:29PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> > > > > > > Add an asynchronous version of i2c_send() that requires the slave to > > > explicitly acknowledge on the bus with i2c_ack(). > > > > > > The current master must use the new i2c_start_send_async() to indicate > > > that it wants to do an asynchronous transfer. This allows the i2c core > > > to check if the target slave supports this or not. This approach relies > > > on adding a new enum i2c_event member, which is why a bunch of other > > > devices needs changes in their event handling switches. > > > > This would be easier to read if you split out the default return of -1 > > in all the devices to a separate patch. > > yes and please drop ibm-cffps.c and ir35221.c which are not in mainline. > I will address them myself. >
Roger.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
