On 14.06.22 10:54, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:09:53 +0100 > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:01:10PM +0200, Julia Suvorova wrote: >>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 5:32 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Julia Suvorova wrote: >>>>> In the ACPI specification [1], the 'unarmed' bit is set when a device >>>>> cannot accept a persistent write. This means that when a memdev is >>>>> read-only, the 'unarmed' flag must be turned on. The logic is correct, >>>>> just changing the error message. >>>>> >>>>> [1] ACPI NFIT NVDIMM Region Mapping Structure "NVDIMM State Flags" Bit 3 >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jus...@redhat.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> hw/mem/nvdimm.c | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> >>> >>> It seems like Xiao is not active, whose tree should this patch go to?
Is that a temporary or a permanent thing? Do we know? > > Perhaps David can add himself as maintainer (i.e. put it > under memory mantanership umbrella) and merge it Maybe it makes sense to combine NVDIMM with pc-dimm.c and memory-device.c into a "MEMORY DEVICE" section. Then, remove "hw/mem/*" from "ACPI/SMBIOS". cxl_type3.c, npcm7xx_mc.c and sparse-mem.c in /hw/mem/ are a bit different. We could add cxl_type3.c to "Compute Express Link". npcm7xx_mc.c and sparse-mem.c should be already covered. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb