Re: [PATCH v7 10/18] jobs: rename static functions called with job_mutex held

[Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito]

Am 24/06/2022 um 17:28 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 6/24/22 16:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Yes, I think Vladimir is having the same difficulties with reading the
>> series as I had. And I believe his suggestion would make the
>> intermediate states less impossible to review. The question is how much
>> work it would be and whether you're willing to do this. As I said, if
>> reorganising is too hard, I'm okay with just ignoring the intermediate
>> state and reviewing the series as if it were a single patch.
> 
> I think we've tried different intermediate states for each of the
> previous 6 versions, and none of them were really satisfactory. :(
> 

Yes. v7 in this case basically means that we tried at least 4-5 times to
reorganize patches.

Nevertheless I could give it a try. I just hope I won't regret it :)

If I don't manage, I will just give up and re-send the serie with
Vladimir's nitpicks.

But yeah, I guess we all agree that this is the last time I reorganize
this serie.

Feedback are always very well welcome, but not anymore on reordering
please ;)

Thank you,
Emanuele