On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:02 PM Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 6:25 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:44:32PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > but I thought you were suggesting we built bits every time the test is > > > run? > > > > In my opinion 3 scenarios are worth supporting: > > - people not touching ACPI, including users - simply don't run the tests, > > comparing tables with expected output should be enough > > - people making changes indirectly affecting ACPI - > > use tests to validate that tables are still well formed, > > using a pre built binary should be enough IMO > > - people working on ACPI - use tests to analyse the tables, > > building from source might be necessary for debugging, > > sources change very rarely > > - people developing the tests > > building from source is required > > > > So I would suggest basically two github repos, one with binaries one with > > sources. We'll keep relevant hashes to use in the script. > > All in all not that different from submodules but I guess > > people have submodules and that is that. > > > > And I personally would probably not tie it to CI whoever owns the > > repository can worry about the builds, and I think keeping > > things distributed is important. > > > > So > > - people not touching ACPI - make check should see directory not found > > and skip the test > > - people making changes indirectly affecting ACPI - > > check out binaries and use > > - people working on ACPI - > > see that source directory is present, go there > > and run make. should not rebuild each time right? > > - people developing the tests > > building from source is required > > Ok I have now committed a Dockerfile that has all the build time > dependencies and builds bits and generates the tarballs/zip file that > my test requires: > https://github.com/ani-sinha/bits/blob/bits-qemu-logging/Dockerfile > > We just need to fork the repo and generate automated builds with this > Dockerfile and put the binaries somewhere. This should also help > developers requiring to rebuild bits when necessary. > Oh and btw, I also made bits compliant with the latest gcc 11 compiler > that comes with Ubuntu 22.04 LTS :-)
Pushed a build script here: https://github.com/ani-sinha/bits/commit/90b99ef05d55ead4b33b2fb19ad07dfb9682ec92 and the bios bits binaries are in this branch: https://github.com/ani-sinha/bits/tree/bits-builds