On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:22:14 +0530 Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 7/19/22 12:16, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 7/15/22 11:37, Xiaojuan Yang wrote: > >> In loongarch_cpu_class_by_name(char *cpu_model) function, > >> the argument cpu_model already has the suffix '-loongarch-cpu', > >> so we should remove the LOONGARCH_CPU_TYPE_NAME(cpu_model) macro. > >> And add the assertion that 'cpu_model' resolves to a class of the > >> appropriate type. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiaojuan Yang <yangxiaoj...@loongson.cn> > >> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> > > > > This patch causes tests to fail, e.g. > > > > TEST float_convd on loongarch64 > > > > qemu-loongarch64: unable to find CPU model 'la464' > > > > make[1]: *** [/home/rth/qemu/src/tests/tcg/multiarch/Makefile.target:29: > > run-float_convd] > > Error 1 > > > > > > What caused you assume that all cpu models are already suffixed? > > Mm. I suppose the use over in hw/loongarch/loongson3.c. > I will make this function match target/alpha/cpu.c, which checks cpu_model > as-is, and then > tries again with the suffix. if we think about adding hotplug/qmp/-device support for CPUs in future, those interface operate with type-names directly without any pre-processing whatsoever. so I'd very much prefer just as-is (i.e. direct type-name matching) (all other model parsing usually comes from legacy code) > > > r~ >