On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:51:47PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 13.12.2011 14:52, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > block_int.h | 83 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Why are these functions static inline in the header instead of being > implemented in block.c? > > The other thing I was going to ask, but don't really know to which patch > I should reply, is whether we need to take care of bdrv_close/delete > while a block job is still running. What happens if you unplug a device > that is being streamed?
There is an additional reference, its not deleted until the operation completes. Or at least it should be like that, Stefan?