On 12/16/2011 08:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 12/16/2011 03:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
- type = g_strdup_printf("legacy<%s>", prop->info->name);
+ type = g_strdup_printf("legacy<%s>",
+ prop->info->legacy_name ?: prop->info->name);
I think this confuses the legacy type with the legacy property names.
I think it would be better to do 'legacy-%s' as then it's at least clear
when something is a type name vs. a property name.
That's only in 8/8. Here I'm not changing property names yet, note that
everything is in prop->info.
This patch prepares for when you'll have a legacy<hex32> type for property
legacy<iobase>, and uint32 for iobase. But I can surely rename legacy<iobase> to
legacy-iobase, if that's what you meant.
No, I got confused. Ignore my comments.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
paolo
