Am 25.07.2022 um 09:38 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
> Add missing job synchronization in the unit tests, with
> explicit locks.
>
> We are deliberately using _locked functions wrapped by a guard
> instead of a normal call because the normal call will be removed
> in future, as the only usage is limited to the tests.
>
> In other words, if a function like job_pause() is/will be only used
> in tests to avoid:
>
> WITH_JOB_LOCK_GUARD(){
> job_pause_locked();
> }
>
> then it is not worth keeping job_pause(), and just use the guard.
>
> Note: at this stage, job_{lock/unlock} and job lock guard macros
> are *nop*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
