Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> writes: > On Donnerstag, 18. August 2022 14:06:04 CEST Guoyi Tu wrote: >> Ping... >> >> Any comments are welcome >> >> On 8/12/22 19:01, Guoyi Tu wrote: >> > socket_get_fd() have much the same codes as monitor_fd_param(), >> > so qemu_get_fd() is introduced to implement the common logic. >> > now socket_get_fd() and monitor_fd_param() directly call this >> > function. > > s/have/has/, s/now/Now/, some proper rephrasing wouldn't hurt either. > >> > Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <t...@chinatelecom.cn> >> > --- >> > >> > include/qemu/osdep.h | 1 + >> > monitor/misc.c | 21 +-------------------- >> > util/osdep.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > util/qemu-sockets.c | 17 +++++------------ >> > 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h >> > index b1c161c035..b920f128a7 100644 >> > --- a/include/qemu/osdep.h >> > +++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h >> > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ int qemu_open_old(const char *name, int flags, ...); >> > >> > int qemu_open(const char *name, int flags, Error **errp); >> > int qemu_create(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error **errp); >> > int qemu_close(int fd); >> > >> > +int qemu_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp); >> > >> > int qemu_unlink(const char *name); >> > #ifndef _WIN32 >> > int qemu_dup_flags(int fd, int flags); >> > >> > diff --git a/monitor/misc.c b/monitor/misc.c >> > index 3d2312ba8d..0d3372cf2b 100644 >> > --- a/monitor/misc.c >> > +++ b/monitor/misc.c >> > @@ -1395,26 +1395,7 @@ void monitor_fdset_dup_fd_remove(int dup_fd) >> > >> > int monitor_fd_param(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) >> > { >> > >> > - int fd; >> > - Error *local_err = NULL; >> > - >> > - if (!qemu_isdigit(fdname[0]) && mon) { >> > - fd = monitor_get_fd(mon, fdname, &local_err); >> > - } else { >> > - fd = qemu_parse_fd(fdname); >> > - if (fd == -1) { >> > - error_setg(&local_err, "Invalid file descriptor number '%s'", >> > - fdname); >> > - } >> > - } >> > - if (local_err) { >> > - error_propagate(errp, local_err); >> > - assert(fd == -1); >> > - } else { >> > - assert(fd != -1); >> > - } >> > - >> > - return fd; >> > + return qemu_get_fd(mon, fdname, errp); >> > >> > }
This becomes a trivial wrapper around qemu_get_fd(). Why do we need both functions? >> > >> > /* Please update hmp-commands.hx when adding or changing commands */ >> > >> > diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c >> > index 60fcbbaebe..c57551ca78 100644 >> > --- a/util/osdep.c >> > +++ b/util/osdep.c >> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ >> > >> > */ >> > #include "qemu/osdep.h" >> > #include "qapi/error.h" >> > >> > +#include "qemu/ctype.h" >> > >> > #include "qemu/cutils.h" >> > #include "qemu/sockets.h" >> > #include "qemu/error-report.h" >> > >> > @@ -413,6 +414,30 @@ int qemu_close(int fd) >> > >> > return close(fd); >> > } >> > >> > +int qemu_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) >> > +{ >> > + int fd; >> > + Error *local_err = NULL; >> > + >> > + if (!qemu_isdigit(fdname[0]) && mon) { >> > + fd = monitor_get_fd(mon, fdname, &local_err); >> > + } else { >> > + fd = qemu_parse_fd(fdname); >> > + if (fd == -1) { >> > + error_setg(&local_err, "Invalid file descriptor number '%s'", >> > + fdname); >> > + } >> > + } >> > + if (local_err) { >> > + error_propagate(errp, local_err); >> > + assert(fd == -1); >> > + } else { >> > + assert(fd != -1); >> > + } >> > + >> > + return fd; >> > +} >> > + > > Up to here you are basically just moving the code of monitor_fd_param() to a > project wide shared new function qemu_get_fd(), but why? I mean you could > simply call monitor_fd_param() in socket_get_fd() below, no? Point. >> > /* >> > * Delete a file from the filesystem, unless the filename is >> > >> > /dev/fdset/... >> > >> > * >> > >> > diff --git a/util/qemu-sockets.c b/util/qemu-sockets.c >> > index 13b5b197f9..92960ee6eb 100644 >> > --- a/util/qemu-sockets.c >> > +++ b/util/qemu-sockets.c >> > @@ -1142,19 +1142,12 @@ static int socket_get_fd(const char *fdstr, >> > Error **errp) >> > >> > { >> > Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); >> > int fd; >> > >> > - if (cur_mon) { >> > - fd = monitor_get_fd(cur_mon, fdstr, errp); >> > - if (fd < 0) { >> > - return -1; >> > - } >> > - } else { >> > - if (qemu_strtoi(fdstr, NULL, 10, &fd) < 0) { >> > - error_setg_errno(errp, errno, >> > - "Unable to parse FD number %s", >> > - fdstr); >> > - return -1; >> > - } >> > + >> > + fd = qemu_get_fd(cur_mon, fdstr, errp); >> > + if (fd < 0) { >> > + return -1; >> > >> > } > > This part looks like behaviour change to me. Haven't looked into the details > though whether it would be OK. Just saying. When factoring out code that isn't obviously the same, it often makes sense to first make it more obviously the same in-place, and only then factor it out. In this case: have PATCH 1/2 change socket_get_fd() in-place to make the code obviously common, then de-duplicate it in PATCH 2/2. > >> > >> > + > > Unintentional white line added? > >> > >> > if (!fd_is_socket(fd)) { >> > error_setg(errp, "File descriptor '%s' is not a socket", fdstr); >> > close(fd);