On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:18 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Xuzhou Cheng <xuzhou.ch...@windriver.com>
>
> spapr->htab is allocated by qemu_memalign(), hence we should use
> qemu_vfree() to free it.
>
> Fixes: c5f54f3e31bf ("pseries: Move hash page table allocation to reset
> time")
> Fixes: b4db54132ffe ("target/ppc: Implement H_REGISTER_PROCESS_TABLE
> H_CALL"")
> Signed-off-by: Xuzhou Cheng <xuzhou.ch...@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com>
>

Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>


> ---
>
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index bc9ba6e6dc..4034f4d130 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ int spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(uint64_t ramsize)
>
>  void spapr_free_hpt(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
>  {
> -    g_free(spapr->htab);
> +    qemu_vfree(spapr->htab);
>      spapr->htab = NULL;
>      spapr->htab_shift = 0;
>      close_htab_fd(spapr);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>

-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to