On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 14:08 Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:51:14PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:48 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:13 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
> > > >> They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start
> to
> > > >> elide redundant has_FOO in generated C"
> > > >
> > > > Commit is referenced using <commit hash 13 chars min> ("commit
> header")
> > >
> > > Apply my patches in your tree, and your hashes will differ from mine.
> > > Hashes can serve as stable reference only when we git-fetch patches,
> not
> > > when we git-send-email then.
> >
> > Has the referenced patch not been pushed upstream already? I thought
> > it was and hence was asking for the reference.
>
> Err, it is just a few patches earlier in this very series you're
> looking at.
Hmm ok. It’s missing from my inbox. Probably was not CC’d to me.
