On 28/09/2022 12.31, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 27/09/2022 13.05, Bin Meng wrote:
In preparation to adding virtio-9p support on Windows, this series
enables running qtest on Windows, so that we can run the virtio-9p
tests on Windows to make sure it does not break accidently.

Thanks for your patches - I've picked many of them for my pull request that I sent out earlier today, so you don't have to carry them along anymore once the PR got merged.

For the patches that are not directly related to tests/ ... could you maybe ask the corresponding maintainers to pick those up? I'm not sure whether they should go through my testing branch, too...

Anyway, there seems to be one more issue: The migration test sometimes seems to be failing on aarch64 with all your patches applied:

87/470 qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/migration-test ERROR          261.71s   killed by signal 6 SIGABRT >>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=171 QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-aarch64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qtest/migration-test --tap -k
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
stderr:
**
ERROR:../../devel/qemu/tests/qtest/migration-helpers.c:205:wait_for_migration_status: assertion failed: (g_test_timer_elapsed() < MIGRATION_STATUS_WAIT_TIMEOUT) ../../devel/qemu/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:201: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0)

(test program exited with status code -6)
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Not sure whether it's really related to your patches or whether it's something else that has been merged recently, I'm having problems to reproduce it reliably, but it's definitely something we should keep an eye on...

Seems like somebody also ran into this issue with a vanilla QEMU:

 https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1230

So it's not related to your patch series.

 Thomas



Reply via email to