On 24/10/22 15:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
We have called cpu_restore_state asserting will_exit.
Do not go back on that promise. This affects icount.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
target/openrisc/sys_helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/openrisc/sys_helper.c b/target/openrisc/sys_helper.c
index 09b3c97d7c..a3508e421d 100644
--- a/target/openrisc/sys_helper.c
+++ b/target/openrisc/sys_helper.c
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ void HELPER(mtspr)(CPUOpenRISCState *env, target_ulong spr,
target_ulong rb)
Extending the diff context from commit 24c328521b ("Tidy ppc/npc
implementation"):
cpu_restore_state(cs, GETPC(), true);
/* ??? Mirror or1ksim in not trashing delayed branch state
when "jumping" to the current instruction. */
if (env->pc != rb) {
env->pc = rb;
env->dflag = 0;
- cpu_loop_exit(cs);
}
+ cpu_loop_exit(cs);
Is the comment still relevant?
break;
case TO_SPR(0, 17): /* SR */