On 11 January 2012 22:41, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11 January 2012 16:31, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> wrote: >> This patch series adds support for the Calxeda Highbank SoC. >> It depends on my previous patch series "various ARM fixes for >> Calxeda Highbank" and "ahci: convert ahci_reset to use AHCIState". >> Some of the patches are carried over from "Various ARM fixes >> for Calxeda Highbank" and were reviewed but not accepted in >> that series. > > So, are there in fact any patches from the "various ARM fixes for > Calxeda Highbank" series which this series depends on and which > haven't been committed to master? It looks to me as if all the > patches from that series either (a) were put into this one or > (b) were committed, but did I miss anything?
Mark: ping? I'm just waiting for an answer to this and also to the question about the secondary boot protocol (see my email replying to patch 5/5) before I take these into arm-devs.next... > Does anybody object to my taking the AHCI patches along with this > series via arm-devs.next ? (other than patch v4 which goes via > target-arm.next) [I got an Acked-by: from Kevin over irc regarding these and will do this.] -- PMM