On 13/01/2023 15.04, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>
---
  tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
index 4be1415823..9a052e41fc 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -217,6 +217,15 @@ static void assert_bad_props(QTestState *qts, const char 
*cpu_type)
      qobject_unref(resp);
  }
+static bool tcg_disabled(void)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_TCG
+    return true;
+#else
+    return false;
+#endif
+}
+
  static uint64_t resp_get_sve_vls(QDict *resp)
  {
      QDict *props;
@@ -338,6 +347,11 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_max_vq_8(const void *data)
  {
      QTestState *qts;
+ if (tcg_disabled()) {
+        g_test_skip("TCG support disabled in this build");
+        return;
+    }

Could you please use qtest_has_accel("tcg") instead? ... that's what we use in other spots in the qtests for checking for valid accelerators already.

 Thanks,
  Thomas


Reply via email to