This reverts commit db8a3772e300c1a656331a92da0785d81667dc81. Motivation : this is breaking vhost-user with DPDK as reported in [0].
Received unexpected msg type. Expected 22 received 40 Fail to update device iotlb Received unexpected msg type. Expected 40 received 22 Received unexpected msg type. Expected 22 received 11 Fail to update device iotlb Received unexpected msg type. Expected 11 received 22 vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -71: Protocol error (71) Received unexpected msg type. Expected 22 received 11 Fail to update device iotlb Received unexpected msg type. Expected 11 received 22 vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -71: Protocol error (71) unable to start vhost net: 71: falling back on userspace virtio The failing sequence that leads to the first error is : - QEMU sends a VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS (40) request to DPDK on the master socket - QEMU starts a nested event loop in order to wait for the VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS response and to be able to process messages from the slave channel - DPDK sends a couple of legitimate IOTLB miss messages on the slave channel - QEMU processes each IOTLB request and sends VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG (22) updates on the master socket - QEMU assumes to receive a response for the latest VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG but it gets the response for the VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS instead The subsequent errors have the same root cause : the nested event loop breaks the order by design. It lures QEMU to expect responses to the latest message sent on the master socket to arrive first. Since this was only needed for DAX enablement which is still not merged upstream, just drop the code for now. A working solution will have to be merged later on. Likely protect the master socket with a mutex and service the slave channel with a separate thread, as discussed with Maxime in the mail thread below. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/43145ede-89dc-280e-b953-6a2b436de...@redhat.com/ Reported-by: Yanghang Liu <yangh...@redhat.com> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155173 Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> --- hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 35 +++-------------------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index d9ce0501b2c7..7fb78af22c56 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -356,35 +356,6 @@ end: return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; } -static gboolean slave_read(QIOChannel *ioc, GIOCondition condition, - gpointer opaque); - -/* - * This updates the read handler to use a new event loop context. - * Event sources are removed from the previous context : this ensures - * that events detected in the previous context are purged. They will - * be re-detected and processed in the new context. - */ -static void slave_update_read_handler(struct vhost_dev *dev, - GMainContext *ctxt) -{ - struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque; - - if (!u->slave_ioc) { - return; - } - - if (u->slave_src) { - g_source_destroy(u->slave_src); - g_source_unref(u->slave_src); - } - - u->slave_src = qio_channel_add_watch_source(u->slave_ioc, - G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP, - slave_read, dev, NULL, - ctxt); -} - static int vhost_user_read(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg) { struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque; @@ -406,7 +377,6 @@ static int vhost_user_read(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg) * be prepared for re-entrancy. So we create a new one and switch chr * to use it. */ - slave_update_read_handler(dev, ctxt); qemu_chr_be_update_read_handlers(chr->chr, ctxt); qemu_chr_fe_add_watch(chr, G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP, vhost_user_read_cb, &data); @@ -418,7 +388,6 @@ static int vhost_user_read(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg) * context that have been processed by the nested loop are purged. */ qemu_chr_be_update_read_handlers(chr->chr, prev_ctxt); - slave_update_read_handler(dev, NULL); g_main_loop_unref(loop); g_main_context_unref(ctxt); @@ -1807,7 +1776,9 @@ static int vhost_setup_slave_channel(struct vhost_dev *dev) return -ECONNREFUSED; } u->slave_ioc = ioc; - slave_update_read_handler(dev, NULL); + u->slave_src = qio_channel_add_watch_source(u->slave_ioc, + G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP, + slave_read, dev, NULL, NULL); if (reply_supported) { msg.hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK; -- 2.39.0
